How about Moneymaker (I’ve heard that used in like, “Shake your moneymaker......”

Posted by  on  03/09  at  10:49 AM

my dear girl he asked
with shock and illgrace
where is your sitting flesh?
your rear carapace?

it’s gone she replied
with a jig and a smirk
I laughed it right off
thanks to dan (the big yerk)

;-)

Posted by sawni  on  03/09  at  01:42 PM

Oh mah lord...you not only cracked me up but you then inspired Sawni to CRACK ME UP!! 

My Dance teacher always used “derriere” and if that was not understood she would bust out with “tighent those butt muscles NOW” usually followed by a rather unpleasant poke in said butt muscle. You can’t stay “en pointe” with looseygoosey moon globes.

Posted by Miss Bliss  on  03/09  at  02:42 PM

i read this and actually HEARD IN MY HEAD the reaction “oh mah lord” - thanks miss bliss, you’ve left a legacy.  :)

the woman who massaged me a couple weeks ago asked if i wanted her to work on my “hips.” i kept thinking, why?  what’s up with my hips?  and then it dawned on me.  hips. 

personally, i like the direct approach : move yer ass.

Posted by romy  on  03/09  at  06:14 PM

I’m glad that you worked out the kinks.  This was a fun post.  (NOTE TO MYSELF:  remember all terms for bootie.)

Posted by  on  03/09  at  07:05 PM

Overlooked in your informative essay about rear ends was your “brother-in-law” reference.  Is he not your “brother-in-law?” This is a vexing question about family trees.  My sister-in-law (wife’s sister) divorced her husband.  Is he properly my “ex-brother-in-law” or “former brother-in-law” or what?

Posted by Bill  on  03/11  at  09:31 AM

re: brothers-in-law: I’m inclined to reserve this phrase for persons who are male blood siblings to a spouse.  My wife’s brother is my brother-in-law.  My sister’s husband is not.  Why would my wife’s sister’s husband get more intimate relational nomenclature than that which my sister’s husband is entitled to?  I think calling someone a “brother-in-law” by virtue of a spousal relationship is a serious breach of protocol.  But then again, I’m kinda weird.

Posted by dan  on  03/11  at  09:59 AM

The back 40? I think in my case it would be the back 60 or so!

Posted by Jeff A  on  03/12  at  08:10 AM

As we shall see, the concept of time has no meaning before the beginning of the universe. This was first pointed out by St. Augustine. When asked: What did God do before he created the universe? Augustine didn’t reply: He was preparing Hell for people who asked such questions. Instead, he said that time was a property of the universe that God created, and that time did not exist before the beginning of the universe. by texas holdem rules

Posted by poker  on  04/19  at  02:27 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages