Friday, March 21, 2003
Okay y’all* are right. I’m
Okay y’all* are right. I’m getting too caught up in cerebrations and not caught up enough in celebrations. What the world needs now is love, sweet love. And one of the things I most love is words. (Is that grammatically correct?) I noticed it yesterday when I was crossing out “bookkeeper” on an org chart and writing in “accountant” and I realized that “bookkeeper” has three matched pairs of letters in a row. Pretty cool. Then I noticed that “accountant” has four letter pairs (of which three are non-contiguous), and I actually spent a few moments wondering whether that made “accountant” a cooler word than “bookeeper.” But instead of resolving the question, I started writing down some words I really enjoy reading, using, saying, spelling (in alphabetical, not preferential, order):
Ambergris
Burgeon
Chitenous
Chryslis
Corposant
Euphoneous
Extrude
Feculent
Gustatory
Manichaean
Mesozoic
Moribund
Penultimate
Perspicacious
Plinth
Protruberance
Prurient
Ululate
Vicissitude
Voluptuary
Just seeing them all lined up together gives me a warm feeling. I don’t even feel the need to blend them into a single cumbersome paragraph. Each one deserves its own paragraph. But not now. I have some beers to drink.
*I’ve long held the opinion that the english language needs a second-person plural pronoun. “You” is ambiguous. There’s I/we, he-she/they - this is sensible, consistent; there’s precedent in other languages. I think “y’all” is the right choice - pithy, concise, established (in some regions) already, and grammatically consonant. For those who deride it as a regionalistic colloquialism, I say this is the nature of language, to evolve, to absorb - even the french are adopting english words, why can the english adopt their own words? We all know what y’all means. Or mean. Oh don’t be mean. Time to go.
